TempoLife

TempoLifeFeaturesHealthier food swaps › grapes

Swaps for Grapes

Grapes is 69 kcal, 0.7 g protein and 0.9 g fibre per 100 g. Here are the 90 alternatives in fruit that beat it on at least one of those, with the difference for each.

69kcal per 100 g
0.7 gprotein per 100 g
90alternatives found

FruitTypical portion: 1 cup104 kcal per portion

Where grapes sits in its own category

The median food in fruit is 60 kcal per 100 g. Grapes is 9 kcal above that, so it is at the heavier end of its own shelf before any swap is considered. A typical portion of 1 cup weighs about 151 g and carries 104 kcal, 1.1 g of protein and 1.4 g of fibre. Every difference below is applied to that same portion, so the tables compare like with like.

Lower in calories

Ranked lightest first. Portion column uses the same 151 g portion as grapes.
Alternativekcal/100 gvs GrapesProteinFibrekcal saved per portion
Real lemon juice17−520.50.7−79
Rhubarb21−480.91.8−72
Concord lemon juice24−450.40.0−68
Rose-apple25−440.60.0−66
Lemon29−401.12.8−60
Watermelon30−390.60.4−59
Lime30−390.72.8−59
Starfruit31−381.02.8−57
Strawberries32−370.72.0−56
White grapefruit32−370.60.0−56

Swapping to the lightest of these 3 times a week is about 236 kcal a week and 12 249 kcal a year, holding everything else constant. That last clause is doing a lot of work: appetite, portion size and what you eat later all move, and none of that is in this multiplication. Read it as the size of the lever, not as a forecast of anything about your body.

Higher in protein

Ranked by protein per 100 g. The "kcal per g protein" column is the cost of that protein in energy — lower is denser.
AlternativeProtein/100 gvs Grapeskcal/100 gkcal per g proteinProtein per portion
Raisins3.3+2.6299915.0
Golden raisins3.3+2.6301915.0
Tamarind2.8+2.1239854.2
Deglet noor date2.5+1.82821133.8
Rowal2.3+1.6111483.5
Florida avocado2.2+1.5120553.3
Prune puree2.1+1.42571223.2
Sugar-apple2.1+1.494453.2
Avocado2.0+1.3160803.0
California avocado2.0+1.3167843.0

Grapes costs 99 kcal per gram of protein. That ratio is usually more useful than the protein column on its own, because a food can be high in protein and high in everything else at the same time.

Higher in fibre

Ranked by fibre per 100 g. The last two columns show how much fibre the energy buys you.
AlternativeFibre/100 gvs Grapeskcal/100 gFibre per 100 kcalFibre per portion
Deglet noor date8.0+7.12822.812.1
Elderberry7.0+6.1739.610.6
California avocado6.8+5.91674.110.3
Dates6.7+5.82772.410.1
Avocado6.7+5.81604.210.1
Raspberries6.5+5.65212.59.8
Kumquat6.5+5.6719.29.8
Feijoa6.4+5.56110.59.7
Rowal6.2+5.31115.69.4
Florida avocado5.6+4.71204.78.5

How a swap is worked out

A swap here is a comparison, not a recommendation. For any food, the page takes every other food in the same category of the database and sorts it three ways: lower energy per 100 g, higher protein per 100 g, and higher fibre per 100 g. Each table shows the alternative’s own figure and the difference against the food you started with, so you can see the size of the change rather than a verdict.

Staying inside one category is what makes the comparison mean anything. Swapping a cheese for a cucumber saves a lot of calories and does not replace the cheese; swapping a cheese for a lighter cheese might. The category boundary is the database’s own, and every alternative links to its full page so you can check the numbers rather than take them from a table.

The candidate list is filtered mechanically to plainly-named foods: no comma in the name, at most three words in the identifier, and no cooking, canning, drying or reconstitution qualifier. That removes the long laboratory variants of the same food and leaves the entries you would recognise in a shop. It also means a swap table is a subset of the category, not all of it.

The weekly arithmetic is deliberately plain multiplication. A saving per portion, times three times a week, times fifty-two weeks. It is what the numbers say, and it assumes you change nothing else — which is exactly the assumption that usually fails in practice.

These are per-100 g database averages for whole foods, not a diet plan. Energy is only one property of a food: protein, fibre, salt, cost, satiety and whether you will actually eat it all matter, and none of them is settled by a calorie column. Nothing here is medical or dietary advice and nothing here is a diagnosis. If you are managing a condition, an allergy or a prescribed diet, speak to a clinician or a registered dietitian.

Source: USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy family — per-100 g values for Grapes and every alternative above · checked 2026-09-02

Other swap pages

Pear

57 kcal, 0.4 g protein and 3.1 g fibre per 100 g.

Kiwi

61 kcal, 1.1 g protein and 3.0 g fibre per 100 g.

Lemon

29 kcal, 1.1 g protein and 2.8 g fibre per 100 g.

Sweet cherries

63 kcal, 1.1 g protein and 2.1 g fibre per 100 g.

Raspberries

52 kcal, 1.2 g protein and 6.5 g fibre per 100 g.

Blackberries

43 kcal, 1.4 g protein and 5.3 g fibre per 100 g.

All swap pages · Full nutrition for grapes

Frequently asked questions

What can I eat instead of grapes?

The lightest comparable food in fruit is real lemon juice at 17 kcal per 100 g, which is 52 kcal less than grapes. On a 151 g portion that is a difference of 79 kcal.

What would swapping three times a week add up to?

About 236 kcal a week and 12 249 kcal a year, if you made that one substitution 3 times a week and changed nothing else. It is multiplication, not a prediction about your body weight.

Are these the only alternatives?

They are the plainly-named foods in the fruit category of this database — 95 candidates in total, of which 90 beat grapes on energy, protein or fibre. Cooked, canned and dried variants are deliberately left out of the tables to keep them readable.

A swap only counts if you make it

Log both versions in TempoLife for a fortnight and the difference shows up in your own numbers rather than in a table.

Create a free accountGet the app